Monday, August 11, 2008

The Horrible Dr. Hichcock [1962]

London, 1885--it must be, because of the montage-tastic opener showing Big Ben striking midnight with the words "London, 1885" printed at the bottom of the screen. A gloved, caped figure opens the casket of a newly-deceased beauty, pausing before lowering itself into the coffin on top of the body. Aaaaand... SCENE. Moments later... The interior of a hidden room--funereal drapes and black walls set the scene while a nubile woman waits, breathless, for her husband to enter. Her husband--the distinguished Dr. Hichcock--fills a syringe with his powerful, experimental anesthetic. She offers her arm to him, he injects the serum, and she drifts into a death-like slumber. After a moment's contemplation, he descends upon her inert body... Another night, a similar necrophillic game is in the offing, but an error has been made--the wife grasps her throat, choking, and expires. Overcome with grief at losing such a Uniquely Compliant Partner, the not-so-good doctor abandons his home (although, one wonders why he doesn't just stay there with the corpse because--you know--when life gives you lemons, fuck your wife's corpse).


Twelve years later, Dr. Hichcock returns with his very-much-alive bride Cynthia, played by the iconic Barbara Steele. Almost immediately, Strange Things soon begin to happen around them and Cynthia starts doubting her sanity.


La Steele, wandering around in the dark with a candelabra--that's practically porn for some of you, isn't it?
Such is the setup for "The Horrible Dr. Hichcock," a 1962 Italogothic shocker directed by Riccardo Freda. The necrophilia plot-line is approached without euphemizing--it's darn clear that Dr. H is into that chillier, stillier flavor of female companionship and he's shown pursuing such avenues of release with a wide-eyed CRAZYFACE throughout the film. His descent into madness as he begins to see apparitions of his beloved dead wife is portrayed with the sort of reeling, mugging literality that befits a melodrama of this variety.



I'm torn on how to approach this movie. I'd seen this a number of years ago and dismissed it at the time, so I wanted to return to it with a fresh eye. I really wanted this to be an amazing example of creepy-kink cinema excellence, and perhaps if I had a better print I'd be more inclined towards generosity but... this movie never quite achieves the levels of greatness it should, given the subject matter and style. Instead, I'm left wanting to watch other, similar films that, while less audacious in their subject matter, are eerier and better-crafted examples of on-screen gothickry. There are hints of "Tomb of Ligeia,"* "Gaslight," and "Rebecca," but those similarities only serve to underscore where "Hichcock" could have gone oh-so-much-better.

Let's not throw the baby out with the necrobathwater, though! There's plenty of neat stuff in this movie to admire. The doctor's post-mortem lusts are portrayed with very little punch-pulling--while you don't get anything that approaches Buttgereitian excess, it's made very clear exactly what is going through Dr. Hichcock's brain. There's a great scene where the doctor is staying late at the hospital and two morgue attendants pass by with a stretcher on which lies a sheeted body displaying Telltale Chestal Mounds. A rather corresponding rise seems to be elicited in the doc IYKWIM. As he contemplates the alluring corpse, all laid out and just begging to get necrodefiled, there's a ghoulish red beam of light cast on the stretcher, enhancing the creepiness by a factor of ten.

Moving on to the small matter of the TOTALLY RIDICULOUS and therefore AWESOME dialogue... It's in there, trust me. As Cynthia starts to crumble under the constant onslaught of weirdness, she flies to the hunkier, younger arms of her husband's colleague, Dr. Kurt Lowe. They share such exchanges as the following, delivered with refreshing matter-of-factitude:

Cynthia: "Is Bernard normal?"
Kurt: "As much as any man of genius."

He's crazy because he's BRILLIANT, honey--that's how smart people roll. I plan on throwing out this explanation all the time, FYI.
But--you're asking--is there a fabulously overwrought soundtrack set to match the Always-Electrical-Storming weather? Why--of COURSE there's a fabulously overwrought soundtrack filled with crescendos and violin trills and aaaaaall that good stuff. How else would we know we were in a gothic melodrama without such aural assistance?
The movie fits-and-starts its way to its climax, which I found to be both confusing and disappointing. I won't spoiler it, but suffice to say I had to watch it twice to see if it made any more sense on another go round--the verdict: NO. You better believe it ends with the house burning down, though! If Roger Corman taught us anything, it's that "cleansing by fire" is the ONLY way to close a gothic flick.

Many thanks to Prof. Jack for the DVD to replace my lamentedly-lost VHS copy :)
*YES, "Tomb of Ligeia" gets a mention here, because a) Vincent Price and b) Vincent Price delivering an impassioned monologue comparing his brain to a cabbage. It's good, people--totally underrated stuff.

15 comments:

Jack said...

I have a borderline unhealthy love for this film. What can I say? It satisfies just the right Special Needs.

Have you seen the sequel, The Ghost?

I love the convention of the falling edifice in Gothic fiction. It's one of the original tropes too...goes all the way back to The Castle of Otranto.

The Costuminatrix said...

So do you think, then, that "The Beast From Hell" was probably a better thing to regale me with than La Steele running through hallways with a candelabra?

I think my brain might have been less broken with this one, necrophilia and all. After all it WAS apparently legal in the Cheese State, at least until it got overturned, so I oughta be used to hearing of such things.

Absinthe said...

La Steele, wandering around in the dark with a candelabra--that's practically porn for some of you, isn't it? -=- why yes, yes it is -=-

You better believe it ends with the house burning down, though! -=- But of course! That is the best way to end a Gothic, when you get close to something that appears to be a stopping point just burn the whole damn place down! ;) Great stuff!

Karswell said...

Oh how I love this film... you must have watched a really dreadful TV print version not to be currently bowing to it's atmospheric awesomeness.

Tenebrous Kate said...

Jack--I FULLY understand you with regards to Special Needs. I haven't seen "The Ghost" yet, but I very much want to. I feel like I missed the boat on this movie--I wanted so badly to dig it but we just failed to connect :(

Costuminatrix--"The Beast in Heat" is way funnier. Also--more baby-shooting. Also also--WAY more pubic-hair-eating.

Absinthe--I share because I care, O Queen of Gothickry :)

Karswell--I know, I feel like I missed the boat on this one. It's practically designed for Tenebrous Delectation.

Kitty LeClaw said...

that's practically porn for some of you, isn't it?

Not practically; precisely.

Tenebrous Kate said...

Kitty, I know you're loving the pic of her in the veil in the Flickr gallery. At least I hope you are ;) I'll have to find some suitably awesome Udo Kier film to discuss just for you, cupcake.

Fred said...

Kate, if you want to stick with the necrophilia doctor theme, you might consider next reviewing Udo Kier in Flesh for Frankenstein (aka, Andy Warhol's Frankenstein). How could you not love a movie with the line "To know life, you must first fuck death through the gall bladder!" And, IT WAS ORIGINALLY IN 3-D!

As for Horrible Dr. Hichcock, I have always been another sucker for La Steele, and while I enjoyed this film, I also was disappointed because it didn't meet my elevated expectations. I also think that Bava and Margheriti (who was the second unit director on Flesh for Frankenstein) did more with Steele than Fredda.

Tenebrous Kate said...

Fred--"Flesh for Frankenstein" is *easily* in my top five favorite movies EVER. I absolutely adore that and "Blood for Dracula"--brilliant stuff on just about every level. F'reals. A single blog post could not contain my glee at these two films, but I might just have to try.

>>I also think that Bava and Margheriti (who was the second unit director on Flesh for Frankenstein) did more with Steele than Fredda

AGREED. I kept wanting to see what this movie would look like if it was directed by Bava (who is a god among mere mortals, directorially speaking). Nobody-but-nobody has done Gothic as well as he did.

The Headless Werewolf said...

All this indicates that someone NEEDS to write about an article about necrophilia in horror movies.

If I remember correctly, THE GHOST has an odd relationship with this movie. It is a sequel, but the plot complications from the previous movie get abandoned pretty much.

kindertrauma said...

Great post Kate, I can't be objective when it comes to Steele, I think she hypnotizes me!-UNK

The Vicar of VHS said...

THE GHOST is actually pretty great--I reviewed it over at MMMMMovies--but from the sound of Kate's synopsis the relationship might be tenuous.

Kitty LeClaw said...

Kate: I am still feeling rather hot under the collar* musing upon the Rock Chick who gets kilt with her own geetar by Da Jason.

* Pun most definitely intended. I take all the low-hanging strings.

Tenebrous Kate said...

Headless--wow, that's, like, a BOOK right there! Definitely an excellent topic and one that's worthy of more discussion. Besides, it'll give me more chance to make TOTALLY UNDERAPPRECIATED punchlines like the lemons/corpse-fucking analogy in my post above ;)

Lancifer darling, between you and Kitty, I feel a need to provide you with more Steeley goodness. Encourage me, whydontcha!

So the rest of you can go appreciate the Vicar's excellence, here's a link to his review of "The Ghost." You're welcome, Liebling ;)

Kitty---Mmmmm... "Jason Takes Manhattan." I can smell the cheese from here! Also--I wish NYC was still percieved as scary like that. *sobs*

The King Of Cool said...

I saw this years ago. I don't remember that much about it. Thanks for refreshing my memory on this movie. I can't even remember whether I liked it or not. I'll have to try to check it out again.