Tuesday, September 2, 2008

The Image [1975]



I've heard "The Image" described as cruel, erotic, and--perhaps most notably--evil. Just as many commentators (in many cases the same commentators) have dubbed the film director Radley Metzger's masterpiece. I'm inclined to agree with all of these assessments. This should be a fairly easy movie to dismiss as a phallic fantasy of dominance and submission in which the man's unflinching will ultimately rules over all womanhood. The careful craftsmanship and loving attention paid to sheer viciousness in this film marks it as a valentine to the psychology of BDSM.


"The Image" is a lush screen adaptation of the novel of the same name by Jean de Berg. Interestingly, "Jean de Berg" is a pen name used by Catherine Robbe-Grillet (wife of author and filmmaker Alain Robbe-Grillet, who wrote a pseudonymous introduction to the first edition of the novel), marking this tale as something other than a product of a misogynistic male imagination.

The film nods to its literary roots from the very beginning, using intertitle cards announcing each "chapter" of the story. We begin with "Dinner at the X's," spelled out in silent-film style, and the narrator begins his recounting...

Let's discuss that narration. Simply put--it's problematic. The voice of the speaker sounds distractingly similar to the voice of the gent on those old "advance the filmstrip when you hear this sound" jobbies. Except, instead of detailing the specifics of truck farming, the narrator is elaborating on his efforts to bed a beautiful model. This distracting narration takes some getting used to and if one can manage to lessen its impact, the film is otherwise hypnotically, almost dangerously, engaging.

At the dinner announced in the first title card, narrator Jean meets his acquaintance Claire and her younger companion Anne. Over cocktails, Jean learns that lovely, doe-eyed Anne "belongs" to Claire and receives a firsthand demonstration of this strange relationship the next day at a Parisian rose garden.

Things take a turn for the kinky when Anne is subjected to a series of tests by her cruel mistress, beginning with forced nudity and progressing to bloodletting via rose thorns and a bit of public urination-on-command. And by "kinky," I actually mean "explicit." I was surprised to see these acts unflinchingly depicted on-screen. There's no cutaway at a strategic moment--the "little fountain" and its product are shown in deliberate, eroticized close-up. The juxtaposition is a little startling, really--the film manages to be thoughtfully-structured and expensive-looking while still being unrepentantly sexual.

There's a great little montage where Jean is contemplating pursuing a sexual rendezvous with Claire in which gushing fountains and the penises of statues are intercut with shots of Jean grinning evilly and remembering his rose garden interlude. It's a moment when the director seems to declare "Fuck Subtlety" and just goes for it in a sleazetastic fashion. I kinda commend this, really.

To what degree the movie becomes sexual is demonstrated in a later scene in which Anne is punished by Claire and Jean for rebuffing Jean. A crazy porntastic soundtrack brimming with wawa pedal and driving bass throbs in the background while Anne is flogged and fellates Jean. Cut-away? You BET there isn't! In fact, there are several more scenes of graphic oral sex later in the film. The film is so full of nudity and graphic sex that it was actively difficult to select screen captures that were of a less-than-X nature! Almost every frame of the film is so lovingly crafted, however, that the entire thing begs to be seen in still frame.

The full range of kink is on display in this movie--foot worship, watersports, beatings, bondage, cutting, temporary piercing, blood-drawing, hiding hors d'ouevres in Anne's vagina (!!!), and a range of psychological tortures including forced sexual encounters with strangers are depicted. No penetrative sex is on tap until the climactic scene. Claire and Jean have abused Anne in a scene that's almost difficult to watch due to its intensity. Anne's cries of anguish are almost too real, and the sadism of the two dominant figures is portrayed with a true sense of nastiness. Overcome by desire, Jean takes Anne sexually, after which Claire cracks and beats Jean. Anne, sensing the weakness in Claire's display, walks out of the relationship after this episode. In a role reversal that's far-from-startling given some of the hints dropped early in the film, Claire then offers herself as a submissive to Jean. And so it goes...

The movie is marked by an amazing performance by Mary Mendum as Anne--her trepidation, fear, erotic tension, and ultimate sexual release just vibrate on-screen. In the scene where Claire and Jean first conspire to abuse her for her impudence to Jean at the booksellers, there is a closeup shot where Anne goes from anguish to eagerness. Her complicity in the goings-on is unmistakable. This is a woman who wants to be dominated. Speaking the line "forgive me, for I know what I do," Anne throws herself to the vicious sport of her chosen captors.

My previous exposure to Metzger's work was via "Camille 2000," which I found to be a little empty and lacking in chemistry. Metzger seems not to know what to do with his male leads--he feels they're integral to the story and yet they languish in cartoon-character limbo.

Carl Parker's Jean is no exception. He plays his role with a sleazy, leering quality that is kind of uncomfortable to watch. In the context of this story, this creeposity serves a purpose, but I couldn't help feeling that a more three-dimensional male lead would've added another layer to the pervy puzzle that is this film.

This is not a movie for everyone's tastes--it's graphic and mean-spirited and utterly unrepentant. Notably, it eats the lunch of the Just Jaeckin adaptation of "The Story of O" and benefits rather than suffers from its embrace of hardcore sexual elements. By depicting the sadomasochism of the characters in such an explicit manner, Metzger allows the viewer to come to his own conclusions regarding the nuances of this relationship.

The Flickr gallery of stills from "The Image" resides here.

12 comments:

The Vicar of VHS said...

>>No penetrative sex is on tap until the climactic scene.

I see what you did there. ;)

I don't know if this is the sort of movie I would actively seek out, but you certainly make it sound interesting, Empress. I'm a sucker for beautiful cinematography used in the service of a slightly (or MORE than slightly) off-kilter artistic sensibility, and this sounds (and looks) to have that in spades.

I admit I'm unfamiliar with Radley Metzger's work, and I may just have to rectify that.

Or maybe not. I guess it'll depend on the mood and the company. If the Duke is having another poker party, perhaps...

Brian D. Horrorwitz said...

Nice rewiew of a great movie! I think "The Image" is one of those films that doesn't hit you right away, but gets under your skin and lingers. I agree that the male lead seemed a bit flat when I first saw the movie. I think that Metzger did it intentionally (or possibly unconciously), maybe so that by placing less attention on him the viewer can see things from his point of view and focus on whats happening with the other people as the story unfolds, like a mysterious flower blooming in high speed. I believe a lot of male directors of Erotica tend to put themselves in the lead-male character's place so as to focus the angle of the eroticism in their own direction, to languish over and fall in love with the female characters. I think this is Metzger's most intelligent film and after watching it a second time I got the feeling that he knew exactly what he was doing as far as the subject matter and the way he presented it.

Fred said...

Thanks for the review, Kate. As always, I enjoy your take on films.

I'm with the Vicar having never seen this one. I've seen some of Metzger's films (Camille 2000 is the one I remember most). While I think I like Camille 2000 a bit better than you, he doesn't rank among my favorite directors (although I guess I have to give him some respect for directing the first porno I ever saw, the Opening of Misty Beethoven). I wonder how The Image would have been if Alain Robbe-Grillet had directed his wife's work instead of Metzger? Robbe-Grillet's films tend to amp-up the surrealism (the BDSM in his filsm seemed more for effect than for erotic purposes), so the result may have been very different and less literal.

On a side note, a friend of mine had the pleasure of taking some courses with Robbe-Grillet when he was a visiting professor of French at NYU (my alma mater). I still regret that I couldn't attend his classes since I don't speak French as my friend just raved about Robbe-Grillet's lectures.

Tenebrous Kate said...

>> If the Duke is having another poker party, perhaps...

And *I*, in turn, see what you did there, Vicar! Parry and thrust ;)

Brian--Thanks (and thanks for stopping by, Oh King of the Trash Palace)! This movie really impressed me and I was honestly surprised to see that Metzger was so willing to push boundaries with portrayals of explicitness on-screen. I agree that the subject matter is handled with a great deal of thoughtfulness. It's a must-see film in the canon of kink!

Fred--I agree that a Robbe-Grillet directed version of this film would likely be extremely different *and* fascinating to watch. I wonder if his personal connection to the author of the book would've made it a more or less successful piece?

>>a friend of mine had the pleasure of taking some courses with Robbe-Grillet when he was a visiting professor of French at NYU

Wow! That must've been an amazing experience. I haven't a word of French (no, I lie--but said words only relate directly to lesbian vampirism), so I'd have been up the creek as well.

Robert Monell said...

Thanks for the terrific review, your writing is very perceptive. I somehow missed this on DVD. I do want to catch up with it. I met Radley Metzger in 1993 and had a chance to discuss my favorite of his films with him, THE LICORICE QUARTET. Highly recommended and literate erotic fantasy. He is a very approachable and unpretentious person.

I used to live in NYC and worked on films there in the 1970s where I actually got to meet Alain Robbe-Grillet at a screening of two of his films, EDEN AND AFTER and SLOW SLIDINGS INTO PLEASURE. He spoke about his films and theories after the screenings. A very interesting evening and the chance of a lifetime to see two rare films in 35mm. Those films are also filled with distrubing S&M acts and imagery, in fact some of the audience left because of that. This was the 1970s, after all.

Karswell said...

Oooo, this sounds great. I've seen Metzger's Camille 2000 and liked it alot, as well as his version of Cat & the Canary with Honor Blackman and Olivia Hussey, so I will definitely have to seek this one out.

The Headless Werewolf said...

That was a fantastic review, Kate! I've only seen three of Metzger's films, THE CAT AND THE CANARY, THE OPENING OF MISTY BEETHOVEN, and THE IMAGE, and you've inspired me to check out more. THE IMAGE, in particular, works on so many different levels, and it's indicative of what a real artist can do with eroticism, even the cruel sort. Today's film-makers just ain't got it--at least none that I've seen.

Tenebrous Kate said...

Thank you, Robert! I'll look forward to seeing "Licorice Quartet," which has been languishing in my queue and definitely deserves a look now that I'm getting more of a feel for Metzger's work.

Though I haven't seen it, "Slow Slidings into Pleasure" is one of the greatest film titles of all time. It just sounds so thoroughly provocative to me!

Karswell--I really dug "The Image." More, in fact, than I was expecting to! Hope you get a chance to give it a peek :)

Headless--Thanks! I am 100% with you regarding the handling of erotic themes in contemporary movies. But if someone wants to chime in with a good, recent rec, I am all ears! (EARS, people--I am a critic, not a pervert ;D)

flightless said...

I am all ears! (EARS, people--I am a critic, not a pervert ;D)

Oh come on, Empress - even your ears are (deliciously) perverse.

Anonymous said...

This movie, is indeed unique...I didn't necessarily care for the whipping, but that is just me. The erotic nature of this film is spectacular though and something head and shoulders about the mindless porn of todays plastic culture.

This film, can be found here:http://xhamster.com/movies/161212/the_image_1975_based_on_the_novel_part3.html for all to see.

It reminds me of a film, I would love to find, but can't seem to remember enough about that I first saw at my friends, when we were perhaps 12-14 which was of course his parents. The film took place on the grounds of a mansion set in the 60's, 70's or perhaps early 80's in which a reporter visits the owner and his entourage that lives at the mansion. It is very erotic as the reporter is introduced to the staff in the most delectable and erotic fashion. It surely would be nice to find. I wouldn't be surprised if this was a metzger film as well.

yuvutu said...

The image is highly erotic. A classic, up there with "story of O"





(Free Porn)

Steve O said...

The film took place on the grounds of a mansion.
I believe the film is called Body Love
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0075775/