As if the subjects and minions of the Tenebrous Empire needed another reason to believe that Jess Franco is a living legend, "The Diabolical Doctor Z" marks a bold CHECK in that director's favor. Like "the Awful Doctor Orlof," this film takes a meager budget and stretches it to its fullest through the use of ingenious cinematography, clever editing, and a wild storyline."Doctor Z" hits all the right exploitation cinema notes. We're treated to mad science, revenge, far-out go-go dancing, ghoulish surgery, and settings steeped in gothic goodness. Add in a smattering of sexiness and a killer robot as well as a plot that moves along at a refreshing clip and you're in for a very fine eighty-three minutes.
Outcast neurologist Dr. Zimmer, with the help of his daughter Irma, has pinpointed the sections of the brain responsible for good and evil in humans. When he appeals to his colleagues for permission to experiment on human subjects (which he's kinda-already done in the form of creating his henchman Hans, a convicted serial killer), his hopes are dashed and he suffers a fatal heart attack. Irma Zimmer vows to carry on his work and seek revenge on the nay-sayers, and boy does she ever do just that! She fakes her own death, kidnaps an exotic dancer who performs under the TOTALLY EXCELLENT MONKIER of Miss Death, equips her with poison-tipped fingernails and brainwashes her into a killing machine.
Plainly put, the movie looks gorgeous. Franco's use of a very long depth of field in scenes shot down alleys and hallways pays homage to Orson Welles and creates a crisp, contemporary look. High-contrast light and dark are used to brilliant effect. There's a sequence in which Miss Death seduces one of the scientists that Irma Zimmer has marked for death (played by the venerable Howard Vernon) that looks particularly gorgeous. When the two begin to speak, the lights dim--the doctor's face is lit from the side, emphasizing his hawk-like features, and only Miss Death's eyes can be seen. It's clear from lighting alone that something intimate yet sinister is in the offing. On-location filming is used to great effect, with Bavarian-style chateaux and gloomy mansions adding extra flavor to the proceedings.
No review of this film would be complete without addressing the amazing nightclub sequence in which Miss Death is revealed. Slithering across a floor painted like a stylized spider's web, Miss Death (garbed in a droolworthy lace bodystocking) makes her way towards a male mannequin, slides up its body, tackles it and dons a skeleton mask before the lights go out. It's perhaps a minute worth of film, but the disorienting angle of the action, shot from top-down, is memorable and effective. Why-oh-why can't real-life nightclub acts be this cool?
Irma Zimmer is a truly formidable villainess--she is portrayed just like a male heavy would be. She's capable, cold-blooded and driven, hell-bent on achieving her goals through any means necessary. Actress Mabel Karr owns the role, and shots from below, emphasizing her commanding presence, underscore the magnitude of her evil. The scene in which she performs her own reconstructive "Yeux sans Visage"-style facial surgery is a jaw-dropper.
Jess Franco appears on-screen as the put-upon police detective investigating the case. His role is mildly comedic--he's an exhausted father of triplets with an eccentric style of dress. Bonus points for the "Orlof"-like appearance of the police kitten on his desk!
The director further links this film to his previous, career-making outing by making reference to Doctor Orlof, who gets a shout-out for his work on the centers of good and evil in the brain. It's interesting to me when a filmmaker creates his own mythology, reusing elements from previous films and connecting his body of work.
Enjoy a Flickr gallery of stills from "the Diabolical Dr. Z" here.






9 comments:
Orlof and Z are two of Franco's most confounding films--because they show what he could do when he really brought his A-game. I love a fair number of his subsequent movies (esp. in the early seventies), because they give such a vivid window into his increasingly strange visions, but I have to grit my teeth when I think of what they might have been if only he'd brought the same directorial discipline and flair. Did confronting his obsessions so directly overwhelm him, and make him lose control of his craft? That's my impression, anyway.
I've also been in a Franco mood lately. I caught MACUMBA SEXUAL and MANSION OF THE LIVING DEAD over the weekend. I've never seen any of Franco's films from the 60's (not for any reason--just haven't), guess I've been missing out. Somewhere along the line Franco lost his focus, maybe? DIABOLICAL DR. Z seem a lot more straight forward than some of his later films.
Curt, I can definitely dig where you're coming from regarding the "coulda been" glimpse these films give. His body of work could be taken as a case study of a creative person trying to strike a balance between strong personal imagery and a commercial drive while not succeeding at either. I find myself "viewing between the lines" with a lot of Franco films, sifting out the amazing moments and savoring those. It's pretty incredible to see his craftsmanship on display in these early films!
Rev, prioritizing one's movie list is among the greatest challenges, isn't it? I feel like every time I watch something, it reminds me of three titles I haven't got round to yet. That having been said, I really do encourage you to set aside a couple of hours for Drs. Orlof and Z--they're amazing flicks and really help put Franco's work in context.
I completely forgot that Moshe Dayan had a rare cameo as the US Ambassador to the UN in Dr. Z (aka Miss Muerte). How cool! Thanks for reminding me.
Dr. Z is easily one of my favorite Franco films. I agree with Curt that he was clearly on top of his game with this one. What amazes me is that not only didn't Dr. Z win an Oscar in a weak 1966 year, it wasn't even nominated!!! I grant you that Oscar winner A Man for All Seasons was a wonderful film, and A Man and a Woman (which took home the Best Foreign Language Oscar, even though Pontecorvo's Battle of Algiers was more deserving), but are you telling me that Faraon, Tri and Lasky Jedne Plavovlasky (all Foreign Language nominees) were any better than Dr. Z? And don't get me started on other top award nominees The Sand Pebbles and The Russians are Coming! The Russians are Coming! (although the latter did feature John Philip Law). But Franco got completely shut out on his best film. The same could not be said of his collaborator on Dr. Z, screenwriter Jean Claude Carriere, who won for Best Live Action Short in '63, and has been nominated for his screenplays for Obscure Object of Desire, Discreet Charm of the Bourgeousie, and Unbearable Length of This Movie.
Estella Blain as Miss Muerte in that amazing body stocking defines the term "HOT!" In many ways, her appearance was sexier than many of the more explicit scenes featured in Franco's later films.
It is interesting that you mentioned Orson Welles in your review, because Franco was fresh off directing Welles's second unit on Chimes at Midnight when he helmed Dr. Z. I remember seeing a public appearance by Christopher Lee when he replied to the question "how could you appear in so many films directed by Franco considering his dubious reputation" by stating that anyone who could have directed the wonderful battle scenes in Chimes at Midnight obviously knew what he was doing.
Okay, I lied, I have seen a Franco movies from the 60's, VENUS IN FURS and CASTLE OF FU MANCHU. Shameful due to the fact that VENUS IN FURS is my favorite Franco movie.
I don't know if inconsistency in the quality of Franco's craftsmanship had to do with losing control over "confronting his obsessions" as much as losing his budget. I think a LOT of it had to do with the amount of money he had to spend, and also the people he had working with him at the time. But Franco is not the type of guy to turn down a project regardless of things like the low budget if he is interested in doing it. While there is no doubt that "Dr. Z" is one of his very best films, I think that even the shittier looking ones sometimes bring something different to the table (sometimes, I emphasize!). I think his mid-90s movie "Tender Flesh", for instance, is one of his most entertaining films despite the fact that it was low-budget and some of the acting is rock-bottom. It just has certain qualities that rise above all that. If you liked Doctors Z and O you should also check out the Franco movies "The Sadistic Baron Von Klaus" (1962) and "Dr. Orloff's Monster" aka "The Secret of Dr. Orloff" (1964), a follow-up of sorts.
This post and its responses reminds me how poorly educated I am wrt Franco, and how I desperately need to rectify this situation. I *do* have "The Awful Dr. Orloff" sitting on my shelf at home...I guess it just got promoted to the top of the TBW list!
I'm not the hugest Franco fan but I do love this movie... and Curt's right, when he was on his A-Game he really could fill the screen with some inspired visuals o'plenty.
Fred--WOW! The breadth and depth of your knowledge is pretty damned amazing!!! I should just post your comment as a Guest Review. Awesome points, all--thank you!
Brian, I'm short-listing "Tender Flesh" based on your rec. I've not seen any of Franco's movies made after the 80s and I'm eager to check this one out. Thanks!
Vicar--you've got Orlof at home, unloved and unwatched? *gasp* But it's so excellent! How's about a deal--I watch "Messiah of Evil" (your review makes that sound tantalizing indeed) and you watch that and we'll dish :)
Karswell, this movie did even more than "Lady Frankenstein" to inspire me in my goal to become a Lady Mad Scientist.
Post a Comment