
Look--we've all got them. Call them "chick flicks" or the male equivalent thereof, there are films of a nature that make them utterly unappetizing to our domestic partners but which sing their siren song to us, beckoning us to view their forbidden excellence when disapproving eyes are out of range. My own brand of "chick flick" is the kind of hazy, languorous, nudity-packed kink-tragedy produced Continentally during the 1970s. I know that for many, the long shots of Significant Glances and the injection of La Philosophie dans le boudoir adds up to boredom of the most excruciating sort, but for me, it's pure bliss. A master of the form, director Jess Franco delivers the titillating goods once again in 1970's "Eugenie de Sade."
Based loosely on a tale by that venerable smut peddler the Marquis de Sade, "Eugenie de Franval" (available to read here, if'n you're curious), "Eugenie de Sade" details an affair between a young woman and her stepfather (a character intended to be her biological father, but changed during script revisions in foresight of censorship rules) that descends into murder, madness and revenge (as these things do). Albert Radeck (played with oily sinisterness by Paul Muller, who LOOKS like a de Sade heavy) is an author and critic whose body of work is dedicated to such taboo topics as black magic and explicit erotic literature, and when he discovers that his stepdaughter Eugenie (whose mother died days after her birth under mysterious circumstances) has been surreptitiously reading forbidden volumes from his collection, he encourages her pursuits. Eugenie is whipped up into quite a froth by her newfound reading material, and her awakened sensuality doesn't go unnoticed by Dear Old Stepdad. There's a mutuality of desire in their eventual coupling--while Eugenie may be naive, she is not a victim. Together, the couple sets out on a series of eroticized murders, targeting beautiful young women until Albert decides it's time to take on yet more challenging game in the person of jazz trumpeter Paul. Eugenie's seduction of Paul has unforseen consequences, and when she begins to fall in love with him, Albert's jealousy flames out of control, leading to the inevitable tragic ending.
All this would have been enough to keep me glued to my seat (hush, you dirty-minded thing, you!) and any movie that opens with close-up girlkissing is already a winner in MY book, but there's an abundance of texture here that makes the film special. The dazzle of "Eugenie de Sade" doesn't stem from flashy cinematography or surrealist setpieces, but directly from the magnetic screen presence of actress Soledad Miranda (credited as Susan Korday) in the title role. A dancer from a very young age, her screen presence evolved into a captivating, erotic naturalism, and there's no doubt in my mind that--had she not been killed at age 27 shortly after completing this film--she would have gone on to an even more remarkable career. Miranda takes what could have been a scanty role as an S&M Lolita and invests the character with an unconscious sexiness that's gorgeous to watch. Her signature pose throughout the film--her legs tucked up under her chin, silently watching and listening--evolves from schoolgirl shyness to sensual lounging to a predatory perching over the course of the film. It doesn't hurt that Franco attires his star in an array of drool-worthy thigh high boots, or that Eugenie exhibits a noteworthy aversion to pants.
The sex scenes are filmed with an unblushing literalism, eschewing soft-focus in favor of sometimes-awkward but authentic-looking fleshiness. Sure, I could've done without shots of Paul Muller's bum during his major sex scene with Soledad Miranda, but this choice to show sex in a realistic manner is an honest one, and the ultra-close-ups on Miranda's parted lips and half-lidded eyes go a long way towards erasing the memories of man-bum.
Franco himself appears in a clever role as author Attila Tanner (dubbed with a giggle-worthy basso voice), who sates his fascination with Albert and Eugenie by following them and eventually revealing that he is aware of their murderous activities. This third-wall-busting turn as actor is a marvelous addition to the storyline--is Tanner complicit in the activities of the main characters? Is he omniscient in some way? It's a mysterious and--yes--humorous addition to the film.
There's symbolism peppered throughout the film, ranging from subtle to blatant. In the library where Eugenie first encounters the erotic literature, she is surrounded by paintings of flowers, evocative of a blooming into womanhood or perhaps of the marriage ceremony. There's a bittersweet moment towards the end of the film, where Eugenie confesses her father's plot to Paul, and the actors are framed by images of idealized womanhood and manhood--she by a larger-than-life pinup and he by a photo of his political idol, Che Guevara.
The visual world of this film is consistent, as it is in other examples of Franco's best work. The color palate here is black, white, and a searing red that is used as contrast during dramatic sequences. It's winter and the bleak backdrop of postwar Berlin enhances the melancholy of the tale. Eugenie and Albert are almost always clad in black, except for when they commit their first murder and don absolutely outrageous-and-therefore-AWESOME red disguises. A red light is employed during the signature Jess Franco Nightclub Scenes, which bookend the first murder and also serve as the first introduction of Eugenie to Paul. Significant Things go down in Franco's nightclubs!
"Eugenie de Sade" has the kind of dreamy narrative and symbolism that Franco incorporates into his best work, and stands as a remarkable document to the talent and beauty of Soledad Miranda. Those seeking explicit BDSM or a fast-cracking plot should look elsewhere, but fans of the prolific and challenging director that is Jess Franco will be delighted.





12 comments:
I adore this one. Franco was very much at the top of his game.
He's a funny old director isn't he. I find some of his sleazier efforts simply unwatchable and short of redeeming feature but I have been going through a bit of a Franco phase myself and watching stuff like this one, the other eugenie film, justine and the bloody judge. All were great. Strange contrasting these with his later WIP flicks.
Too bad no one made La Philosophie dans le boudoir into a movie. It would make Caligula look like Romper Room.
I have always wanted to see this, though Eugenie de Franval was never a standout Sade read for me.
One that would make a great film is Oxtiern, or The Misfortunes of Libertinage - the story, not the play (though maybe a mix?). It is a great Sadean story without the traditional Sadean outré - has all the normal elements in a more R-Rated format.
Darius, I did a quick search and found this one-
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0133148/
La philosophie dans le boudoir
Come to think of it I am sure I got the issue of Continental Film Review from 1971 that reviewed this one
Nigel, I really do stand by my assertion that if Franco wasn't so damn prolific, people unfamiliar with his body of work wouldn't continue to be surprised by the quality of his best work. He's really quite a fascinating character!
Darius, I think the best Sade adaptations I've seen are in comix form, which allows the artists more freedom in depicting the more outrageous elements of the works. Because you're absolutely right that there's very little chance of an "authentically" Sadean feature film ever being made.
WRT "Philosophie...," Nigel is correct--there was a film *titled* after that book at any rate! I reviewed it here--I got a rather mysterious copy at some point and gave it a watch. Interesting, weird, psychedelic stuff:
http://tenebrouskate.blogspot.com/2008/07/beyond-love-and-evil-1971.html
I watched "de Sade" on fancast recently (Keir Dullea, Senta Berger, John Huston) and was surprised at how good it was. Maybe not terribly accurate, but did cover his main conflicts - his parents and his forced marriage, his Libertine uncle (Huston), and his awful mother-in-law. Well worth watching, particularly since it is free. Don't have a link, unfortunately, but it is at http://fancast.com/
So far, the best adaptation of a Sade work is Salo... It is exactly as terrible as it should be.
Although Marat/Sade is an excellent look at l'Divine Marquis as well.
Word verification: cornwar
You've reminded me how much I LOVE this film. The fact that Franco and Soledad Miranda can draw so much poignancy from exploitation material just shows how amazing they were together. As much as I adore Lina Romay, Franco never had a more perfect partner.
I picked up a Video Search of Miami VHS of this back in the day, hoping it might be the other Franco Eugenie flick (Eugenie: The Story of Her Descent into Perversion with Marie Liljadel and some dude named Christopher Lee). Even though I was "disappointed" it wasn't the Franco I was seeking (this used to happen more times than I can count, a testament to the prolific Jess), my disappointment soon faded as I was treated to quite a cinematic experience. I agree with the others that Soledad was the best. As most others, my first exposure to the Iberian beauty was in Jess Franco's Count Dracula, but Eugenie de Sade and Vampyros Lesbos really showed off her strengths. One can wonder how things might have been different had she not perished at such a young age.
Darius, my pall Joey Zone recommended the Kier Dullea "De Sade" film a while back. Thank you for the link--I am even more curious to see this movie due to your recommendation!
Headless, I COMPLETELY agree with you regarding the Franco/Miranda pairing. She's such a muse to him, and she works beautifully under his direction.
Fred, I have the *other* "Eugenie" at home as well and am looking forward to giving that a watch! These Blue Underground releases sure have spoiled us, haven't they? NOT that I am complaining, mind you.
I was recently called out for being an unfair dick in a column I wrote for Sound On Sight about Franco and how I think he's a talentless hack that peaked too soon. I think the guy has his moments, but for the most part he does nothing for me.
I also reject the notion of his style to be "dreamlike". I see that description applied to a lot of wacky European directors whose plots make no sense and actors that look nothing short of confued at all time.
I'm just venting my opinion here, but I think if Franco could have just calmed down and maybe maybe 150 fewer film, his overall career would have been more consistent.
Cinema Suicide, I can absolutely see where the appeal of even Franco's most lauded works would be inscrutable to a lot of folks, and I agree that if he produced fewer films with more consistent quality, he'd be taken more seriously as a filmmaker. Franco's aesthetic--when he's exercising it--happens to overlap a lot of what I find most interesting in a director: warped narrative, a very personal expression of eroticism, and a catalog of symbols that creates a body of work that's more interesting *as* a body of work than when taken individually. If, however, Franco's aesthetic isn't in line with what a viewer finds interesting in the filmmaking process, there's little to recommend it because he does tend to throw a lot of shit at the wall just to see what sticks (and most of it *doesn't*). That having been said, to dismiss him as "talentless" seems inaccurate to me--"frequently misguided" is legit; "not usually successful" even moreso. But "talentless" indicates someone that's hopelessly flailing about with the medium, and having watched films like "Venus in Furs," I have to say that the guy knows what he's doing--this is a factor of his body of work that can be especially frustrating, and why Franco is so interesting to discuss.
Also--agreed WRT the overuse of the term "dreamlike" as a synonym for "doesn't make a lick of sense." Similarly, I cringe when I see the term "surreal" used by people whose concept of that art movement appears to have something to do with having smoked dope in front of a glossy poster of "The Persistence of Memory."
I am not a huge Franco fan, but I have an affinity for people who only have one great work in them (not to limit Franco's to one, per se). My favorite example is Raymond Chandler. The Big Sleep is incredible, but his novels got progressively worse as he slowly drank himself to death. His later books definitely have their moments, but don't live up to the first.
Post a Comment