Monday, February 1, 2010

Jack the Ripper [1976]


Let's just establish right here, right now, the fact that Jess Franco's 1976 version of "Jack the Ripper" has exactly nothing to do with historical veracity. The still-unidentified serial murderer who cut short the lives of at least five prostitutes between 1888 and 1891 in the seedy Whitechapel district of London serves as a jumping-off point for Franco to create a moody character study that imposes his own themes on a skeleton of fact. With that official Ripperologist Warning out of the way, let me just say that I'll take the substitution of "Klaus Kinski" for "Historical Crime Procedural" any frikkin' day of the week. Watching Mr. Kinski emote provides one of the great pleasures of genre cinema--the man had an overwhelming cinematic presence, and y'all know how I feel about those brooding Germans. The pairing of Kinski and Franco in a Victorian murder mystery movie promises quite a bit of joy, but does it deliver on these promises...?

"Jack the Ripper"

"Jack the Ripper" is a revisiting of Franco's signature Dr. Orloff character, the emotionally tortured, morally kinked doctor whose obsessions lead him to murder and destruction. Usually this involves a heavy dose of "face-stealing" with a soupcon of "incest"--what this movie lacks in the former, it more than makes up for in the latter. Kinski plays Dr. Dennis Orloff, a London physician whose troubled childhood has inspired him to donate his services to the poorest of the city's denizens, but has also made him into a terrifying misogynist that stalks, rapes, murders and mutilates prostitutes. His assistant, the character who would be named Morpho in one of the other Orloff films, is a facially-scarred woman named Frieda who is utterly devoted to assisting the doctor for reasons never really explored in the movie.

"Jack the Ripper"

Produced by the same West German company that funded Franco's notorious and gorgeous Satan-in-the-convent shocker "Love Letters of a Portuguese Nun," "Jack the Ripper" shares some of the look and feel of that film, though it's sadly less resonant than the later movie. The cinematography is sharp and the lighting skillful, but where "Love Letters" used its locations to its advantage, "Jack the Ripper" feels artificial. For those people who are still rooting for the truffle of historical authenticity, just give it up--the London of this film is totally un-London-ey, no matter how much faux fog the art director fills the set with. There's a certain creaky charm to the sets, with touches like the OLIVER TWIST pub not going unnoticed by me. The costumes (particularly the costumes used to dress the female characters) are an actually-kinda-endearing hodgepodge of community-theatre-grade "My Fair Lady" gowns and hats in an array of shiny, psychedelic fabrics. I wouldn't be surprised to learn that there was a smoking ban on set to reduce the chance of Eurobabes bursting into flame because her petroleum-based gown went alight.

"Jack the Ripper"

The supporting cast does a creditable job in the daunting task of backing up Kinski's performance. Herbert Fux* appears in a typically Fux-ian role as a greedy fisherman who is a patient of Orloff's who catches wise to the doctor's nocturnal activities. Perhaps the most often-remarked-upon appearance is that of Lina Romay in the role of the exotic cabaret performer Marika who flaunts her charms in an assless teddy**. Her doll-like mouth and wide-eyed expressiveness are used to great effect in her all-too-brief appearance in this film. The scene in which Marika is raped and murdered by Orloff is the film's most disturbing, due in no small part to the fact that Romay's murmurs evoke ecstasy as much as--if not maybe more than--the last breaths of a dying woman.

*I'm still allowed to giggle, even though I know it's pronounced "Fewks."
**If people can say "assless chaps," even though chaps are de facto assless, then *I* can say "assless teddy."

"Jack the Ripper"

"Jack the Ripper"

Speaking of that murder scene, there's some really squicky gore in this flick--all the more so because it feels abrupt and aggressive, and is overtly sexualized. There's a direct link between the sex act and the trauma to the female body that's underscored by Kinski's emotive performance. His face conveys a bone-deep lust and perversion, and his movements are animalistic. It's effective and wrenching enough that the scenes of Orloff's violence make one forget about the rather silly trappings of the rest of the film.

"Jack the Ripper"

The story of Police Inspector Selby and his romance with prima ballerina Cynthia (shades of "Awful Dr. Orloff" once again!) isn't terribly engaging, and never musters up a fraction of the emotion of the Ripper portions of the movie. Some good choices are made during the "detection" sequences, though, such as the inclusion of the blind man whose keen senses lead to Orloff's eventual unmasking. This character's use of smell, hearing and almost-preternatural perception underscore the sensual elements of the film. Much to my delight, the identikit/police sketch sequence was included, resulting in a rather excellent Kinski caricature.

"Jack the Ripper"

Alas, the promising build-up of this movie leads to a sputtering-out conclusion that tarnishes the impact of the preceding ninety minutes. It felt as if the script-writer needed to put a bow on the story and was averse to the kind of fiery conflagrations that mark the end of, say, a Corman Poe flick. We're left with a strangely unemotional sorta-ending to mark what's otherwise been a pretty darned effective, and sometimes downright alarming, character study.

Franco fans, Kinski fans, and fans of Lina Romay's ass could do a LOT worse than this movie (no, really--A LOT WORSE; take my word on this). Feel free to imagine your own coda, though, as the one provided leaves plenty to be desired.

6 comments:

Jen said...

I have to see this--I am totally obsessed with Kinski right now. Thanks for the review!

The Duke of DVD said...

Kinski and naked asses? Sign me up! Even if it has little to nothing to do with Jack's victimizing of prostitutes (for more of that than you can stand, see the Vicar's autobiographical masterpiece A Cock Crows Twice (In My Pants)), I can see clearly it is worthy of study, as is anything by Franco.

Bravo on the review!

Tenebrous Kate said...

Jen, I think you'll find plenty to enjoy here! KK is a blast to watch, and I'm making it a point of actively seeking out his films. Granted, I'm also kicking myself for not having gone on this quest earlier, but there ya go--there are only so many hours in a day!

Thanks, Duke! Knowing that you're a fellow trash aesthetician, I think you'd dig this movie. There's just something about these 70s Period Pieces that hits me where I live. If only real Victoriana was THIS psychedelic!

Fred said...

I saw this almost 25 years ago (man, I really am old!) on a pan-and-scan VHS which wasn't helped by the heaping helpings of fog served up by the set designers. I enjoyed Kinski's performance, but then I can't think of anytime I didn't enjoy Kinski's performance in a film. But as for the film, I found it lacking, which is a shame since you would think that Kinski + Franco + Lina's butt = perfection. I think what hurt was that Franco felt constrained by the Jack the Ripper requirements (i.e., mystery man murdering tarts in Foggy Olde London). If he dispensed with the whodunit? and the Jack the Ripper trappings, he could have had a masterpiece on his hands (the violence is some of the most realistic and shocking I've ever seen in a Franco film). Still, Lina's backside does look nice in this one, so I guess I shouldn't complain too much. And Kinski is awesome as ever.

Anonymous said...

tdraicer:

Who is not a fan of Lina's ass-even when she gained weight, went blonde, and was billed as Candy Coster? But I admit I prefer her in roles where she does the sexual killing. (In my defense, if one is needed, a thing for black widows seems a rather common male fantasy-certainly one shared by Franco).

Tenebrous Kate said...

Fred, I'm in total agreement that this movie should be filed under "Coulda Been Great." It's so similar to other films in Franco's body of work that it comes up short in comparison. I found "Awful Dr. Orloff" to be way more compelling due to the more interesting "good guys" as well as the "disfigured daughter" motivation. Were it not for KK (and that's saying a LOT, since he really carries the film), this would have been a throw-away.

No need for a defense, TD! This is the land of the "Out Loud Voice" :) I'll confess I was a little lukewarm on Ms. Romay initially, but I'm learning to love her (if not as much as Soledad Miranda, I fear). She comes across as being incredibly uninhibited, which is a great quality when one is acting in a Franco flick!