Even before re-engaging with the sensation that 1990's "Troll 2" has become, I heard about the production of a film called "Best Worst Movie" that would document the cultification of this oddball flick, from the perspective of "Troll 2"'s child star Michael Stephenson. Right up front, I have to say that "Best Worst Movie" would have had to do a lot of wrong in order to alienate me, and I'm not at all surprised to have found it a totally engaging, funny, and sometimes even poignant movie-watching experience. Much in the way that "Troll 2" very much earns its reputation at the top of the so-bad-it's-good pantheon, and as such has a relatively small but rabid following, "Best Worst Movie" will be adored by fans of the cult film experience, while its appeal may fly right over the heads of more general audiences."Best Worst Movie" portrays the making of "Troll 2" in a manner not dissimilar to the depiction of community theatre in Christopher Guest's "Waiting for Guffman"--there's the visionary-to-the-point-of-delusion director, the eccentric cast, and the heartbreakingly terribly final production. In 1989, Claudio Fragasso, director of such camp classics as "Rats: Nights of Terror" and the 1984 Alice Cooper vehicle "Monster Dog"*, came to Utah and cast a bunch of unknown locals in a movie scripted by his long-time girlfriend Rosella Drudi that was intended to satirize the fanaticism of vegetarians. Months went by, and eventually the cast became aware that their movie, "Goblins," was being played during off hours on HBO. One by one, the cast members saw the movie and one by one, the cast members were horrified at the awfulness of the finished product. During this period, I too saw the movie, deemed it dreadful**, and all but forgot about it--yes, this is a case for my brother being a LOT cooler than me, since he recognized the magic of "Troll 2" even at a very young age.
*I saw this on video in the mid-90s. It's fucking terrible and makes one yearn for Cooper's appearances in "Freddy's Dead," "Prince of Darkness," and even "Sextette." Life sucks for completists, I assure thee.
**I grew a sense of humor in intervening years, thank heavens.
In the years that followed, the cast members had gone on to lead the rest of their lives. In-movie dad George Hardy continued to pursue his career in dentistry, in-movie sis Connie McFarland went on to get married and continued her acting career with bit parts, and Fragasso kept on churning out schlock. Almost two decades later, something very strange began to happen--fans of trash cinema began to vocally embrace "Troll 2." It's crucial to note that the fandom of "Troll 2" is a relatively recent development--it's not a continuation of a group founded in the early 1990s, but rather a sensation fueled by social networking and the rise in prominence of "So Bad It's Good" cinema in the post-"Mystery Science Theatre 3000" landscape. Upon discovering that their shameful secret had been unearthed, the cast members reacted with surprise, ultimately embracing their strange variety of fame. It's fascinating to see the varied reactions of the actors, from George Hardy's delight (it's he who actively seeks out the first vocal "Troll 2" fans at New York City's Upright Citizen's Brigade comedy theater) to the genuine bafflement of Don Packard, who played the general store owner.
The film starts to explore some fascinating elements of the "Bad Movie" fandom when the documentarians visit Claudio Fragasso in Rome. Fragasso speaks in high-minded terms of the pride he feels at fans embracing his film in spite of the cruel words of critics. It's clear that he doesn't understand that people love "Troll 2" because of it's balls-out weirdness, and watching footage of him attend American screenings of his film is both hilarious and deeply uncomfortable. It's an interesting commentary on creative projects and the manner in which audiences claim them as their own. Is it better to have one's work be appreciated widely, if not for the reasons one set out to create that art? Or is it better to go unappreciated entirely?
Further aspects of rabid fandom are touched upon when Hardy and Stephenson attend fan conventions to promote "Troll 2." At the "Troll 2" screenings, they are superstars, mobbed by fans, appearing on t-shirts and at the center of the goings-on. At the fan conventions, they are but a blip on the radar of the larger portion of the attendees. It's interesting to watch Hardy, in particular, struggle with the horror convention experience--he's pretty grossed-out by the con-goers (who can blame him?!) and begins to question his own legacy. After interacting with several actors from sequels in the "Nightmare on Elm Street" series, he starts to wonder what it would be like to hang his entire selfhood on what's really such a small moment in his life. It's a poignant and authentic moment.
"Best Worst Movie" is full of great moments that get to the geeky heart of what it means to be a capital-F FAN. At the end of the day, is it really so different for a "Troll 2" enthusiast to talk about the movie's "magicalness" than it is for Fragasso's colleagues to claim that the movie inspired "Harry Potter?" And is the joy so very different for members of either fandom?
"Best Worst Movie" is playing this week at Village East Cinema in New York City though March 20th. The film is independently released and not available on DVD--check this out festival-style while you can! More screening info is available on the "Best Worst Movie" website here.
6 comments:
Great piece on BEST WORST MOVIE. I'm eager to see it. Sounds like it has an air of tragedy.
To be honest, I fail to see the fuss over Troll 2. I'm very "blah" about it. I never found it to be "so bad it's good," or "so bad it's terrible." I find it to be one of the few things in my life that fails to get any sort of response out of me. I don't hate it, I don't like it. I just find it to be pretty much nothing. Just my two cents worth.
Excellent piece. I never really got what made Troll 2 better/worse than any of the other ones out there, maybe the pure audacity of it?
Thank you, Phantom!While there's a lot of spoofy, fan-joy stuff in "Best Worst Movie," there's also an exploration of what it means to "fail" or "succeed" in the world of genre filmmaking that's pretty damn thought-provoking and--yes--sad at times. I admire your analytical brain and think you'll get a lot out of this one!
David, I really think fan responses to movies are deeply personal. Comedy and horror work on some of the same axes, so it's hard for folks who aren't drawn to a certain movie (or type of movie) on a visceral--almost subconscious--level to understand what the fuss is all about. I like "Troll 2" and find it to be silly fun, but I agree that it's not by a LONG shot the worst film out there, or even the best "bad" movie I've seen. But then again I hate ranking stuff, so I'm exactly the WRONG person to ask...!
Thanks, Simon! I think one of the things working in "Troll 2"s favor is that there's a nostalgia factor for some viewers. It's easier for an American audience to get into "Troll 2," which in spite of its weirdness of execution is a fantasy story about a normal family put into a nightmarish situation. It's easy to contextualize "Troll 2" as a whacked-out version of something most audiences have seen before, making the contrast between "good" and "bad" that much more obvious. But I'm getting WAY too deep into trying to puzzle this out--I risk becoming academic and by extension TOTALLY un-fun...!
We opened this at the Denver International Film Festival last year and it got a lot of play even from casual moviegoers (though the night it did best was the ten o'clock double feature with Troll 2 full of people who already knew), and looks like an easy top five docs of the year to me. It genuinely captures the kind of weird joy that comes from the enjoyment of trash cinema and is somehow as enjoyable as watching Troll 2 with a bunch of friends. I think we could have done a double feature at five o'clock with a bunch of turgid Capital C Cineastes and they would have stuck around for the following hilarious cinemess and enjoyed just as much as any Nilbogian (I don't know if that's a thing, but I'm assuming it is).
Also: George Hardy is exactly as genuine and just totally nice-guy as he is in the documentary. It's a little bit mind blowing, actually.
I've loved Troll 2 since I was a kid. This was back during the good old days of Cinemax when they would show obscure films late at night and Troll 2 was on heavy rotation. My brother and my dad couldn't understand why I liked the movie and they themselves loved the occasional dose of cheese.
I thought I was the only one in the world that could appreciate the campy entertainment that was Troll 2. It's good to see that the film is starting to gain momentum as a cult classic next to other good bad movies like Plan 9.
Great article Kate! I'm hoping that they bring Best Worst Movie to Phoenix but I highly doubt it.
Post a Comment