Monday, February 21, 2011

The Keep: Film, Book--Frustration In Two Mediums


I'm not sure what I expected to feel after watching "The Keep," a movie that is widely noted to be a cinematic misfire. Unkle Lancifer recently did a beautiful job of capturing the attract-repulse appeal of this movie over at Kindertrauma, and my interest had been piqued by his article. After watching Michael Mann's 1983 supernatural horror film and feeling as unfulfilled as Unk, I was still interested enough in its story of Nazis pitted against an elemental evil that I figured the source novel by F. Paul Wilson would clarify some of the muddled mess of the movie. As it turns out, I was right, but the clarity provided by the book didn't improve the story. Now I'm in the unenviable situation of feeling frustrated as a viewer and as a reader.

Friends, this is going to get spoilery, so keep that in mind if you choose to continue reading.

Watching Mann's 1983 version of "The Keep," it becomes clear that the production was plagued by typical horror-movie issues: budgetary strictures, wonky FX, and the pressure to stick to a 90-minute run time. Viewing the movie without having read the book makes the story feel pretty incomprehensible after a certain point. In the film, a group of Wermacht soldiers arrive at an ancient fortress in Romania, having been told to hold this position to enforce the Eastern front. After some treasure-hungry soldiers pry a protective sigil off the wall of the building, a series of gruesome killings begin to occur as the result of the unleashed evil. A squad of SS einsatzkommandos arrive as reinforcements, but their brutal methods put the two groups of Germans at each others' throats. Jewish historian Theodor Cuza and his daughter Eva are brought in to investigate the causes of the deaths, and they soon come in contact with the supernatural entity behind the killings. When a mysterious stranger shows up in the little village, it soon becomes clear that there are Evils Greater Than Man at work. Then everything deteriorates into a hott mess of rubbery creature FX, unclear timelines, half-baked mythology, romantic-entanglement-outta-nowhere and lasers.

The Keep

It would be easy to dismiss the movie entirely if there weren't flashes of very real awesomeness in there. The locations and set design are gorgeously atmospheric. Right from the first frames, it's clear that the setting is going to play a large role in the tone of the film. As the troops roll through a fairytale Romanian village, the black stone structure of the keep emerges from the mist. The scale of the keep is emphasized from its first appearance--it's a daunting, black stone structure that towers over the surrounding village. The film finds its chilling high point early on, when the soldiers pry a silver cross from the wall. Lensed using slow motion, billowing fog, and glowing lighting, this sequence builds suspense that leads to a satisfyingly gruesome payoff.

The Keep

Much of "The Keep's" cult appeal has been laid at the doorstep of the synth soundtrack by Tangerine Dream. Fans of Michael Mann's work will be unsurprised at the pitch-perfect matching of movie to music, and this effort is no exception. I'll confess that I'm partial to the pairing of moody synth with supernatural themes and this is another instance where the music track enhances the on-screen content.

The Keep

The cast includes a number of notable names. Jürgen Prochnow is perfectly cast as Wermacht Captain Klaus Woermann and Gabriel Byrne puts in a performance that has moments of both over-puffed camp and genuine creepiness as SS Major Kaempffer. The scenes that focus on the tension between these characters (and the soldiers they control) are the best in the film. This conflict between the officers deftly sketches the larger-scale conflict within the German war machine during WWII. It's interesting to see the way these men cope with the deaths within the keep and the revelation of the otherworldly forces at work.

The Keep

The depictions of the "good guy" characters are significantly less engaging, and that's a real problem when the audience is meant to root for them as they battle against charismatic evil-doers and a timeless supernatural killer. Ian McKellen's turn as Professor Cuza is actively awful, to the point where I kept thinking that the actor in this role was some terrible unknown actor who happened to look a lot like Sir McKellen. Alberta Watson's Eva is mainly "pretty" and Scott Glenn focuses on "aloof" with a single-minded intensity in his portrayal of the mysterious visitor.

Then there's that plot. There are large chunks of character development that have been left out, and there's no explanation of where the monster in the keep comes from. Being that this is a horror film, I can overlook a certain degree of that, but the last half hour goes so far off the rails that I just gave up trying to understand anything. It's fortunate that I wasn't alone when I watched "The Keep," because otherwise I'd have assumed that I was the victim of alien-abduction-induced Missing Time.

The Keep

Working under the theory that Really Cool Stuff had been excised from the movie in order to accommodate a shorter run time and curious to check out what I'd missed, I grabbed a copy of F. Paul Wilson's novel of the same name and set to reading it.

There are some key differences in Wilson's novel that work in its favor. Woermann and Kaempffer are more richly depicted, and they are given a backstory that begins in the trenches of the first World War and traces their diverging military careers. The monster in the keep initially convinces the humans that he is a vampire before his true nature is revealed. Professor Cuza is kind of a selfish, traditionalist dick instead of just the victim of bad acting. His daughter Eva is less-sexily named Magda and is nearly-raped several times, rather than just once in the film. And yes, much of the stuff that didn't make any sense in the movie is explained, though not necessarily for the better.

The Keep

When dealing with monsters on film, a nugget of wisdom holds that one should reveal the creature at a strategic point in the narrative in order to maintain suspense for as long as possible. Not knowing what is going on in the keep provides a large portion of the story's eeriness. So when it comes to light that the creature is an evil being from pre-human times who is being hunted by a good being also from pre-human times, it's kind of hard to care. It would've been impossible to explain the monster and still have it hold the same degree of fright. If anything, the novel over-explains the supernatural elements, making their magic evaporate.

Furthermore, it's one thing to watch Nazis getting killed by an elemental evil--that sort of monster-on-monster action is pretty great in any manifestation. I could even overlook the kinda-triteness of the inherently-decent Jewish academics. But when a superpowered dude fighting on the side of light has to show up and pull everybody's muffins out of the oven like a muscley deus ex machina... that's just not interesting. Villains fighting worse-villains, or regular people fighting villains AND worse-villains both make for interesting setups because they're working against overwhelming odds. When somebody shows up with a magic demon-bopping stick and then GAME OVER's the whole damn thing, it feels like a ripoff. It's as boring as a Superman story. He's fucking Superman--he's going to be fine because he's impossibly good and damn near invulnerable, and who the hell cares about that?

At the end of the day, the positive message one can take from "The Keep" is that the ultimate Nazis versus Things That Are A Lot Like Vampires story has yet to be told. Book and film have some intriguing elements, but each is too flawed to be considered a classic of horror storytelling. The real tragedy of "The Keep" is that in straddling the line between EC Comics weirdness and epic myth-making, it manages to miss the boat on both.

14 comments:

The Vicar of VHS said...

I was thinking DC Comics here too, if only because the creature in that last pic looks a lot like Darkseid.

I only saw the keep once, back in my late adolescence, and chiefly remember an oddly choreographed and extremely brightly lit sex scene with female full frontal. But then those are the things that tend to stick in my brain from that era of my emotional formation. ;)

Darius Whiteplume said...

I have not seen/read, but am surprised that something with such an awesome cast could be so bad - considering it was not a super-hyped blockbuster, and some of these folks were still green at the time.

While I am no fan of Nazis, it would be interesting to see them as heroes; or maybe brave is a better word? Not all of these guys were inhuman beasts, they were towing the line because you had to; that is what fascism is after all. Not trying to be an apologist, but if we can have drug dealer or murderer heroes then I guess we could have a Nazi hero?

David said...

Respectfully disagree. Love this film and always will. Seriously the one thing I will kill to have on DVD.

Soukesian said...

Caught this film late night on British TV many, many years ago - if I'd known it was going to become such a rarity, I'd have paid more attention. And had fewer beers. Maybe.

You know there's a boardgame out there to be frustrated by as well, right?

Chris H said...

Evils Greater Than Man you say? Well if we're talking Jurgen Prochnow, I'll just stick with In the Mouth of Madness. I might as well watch that right now to eliminate my bad mood; I ordered one of the undocumented, harder to find Godfrey Ho/Pierre Kirby offerings off of eBay from Germany...and it's dubbed into German without subtitles. *sigh*

Will Errickson said...

Years ago I tried reading the book and wasn't impressed; barely got 50 pages in. Watched the movie a couple months ago and besides the TD score and the ALIEN-esque bit when the two soldiers peer into the abyss beneath the Keep, I was confused and vastly disappointed. Actually, no, I wasn't disappointed, because I'd heard for years the movie wasn't really any good. Mann, never one of my favorite directors anyway - I can NOT understand the love he gets in the movie blogosphere - has disowned the movie.

kindertrauma said...

I still consider myself torn. I have to confess to being an absolute sucker for the visuals and combined with the soundtrack I think it really does offer something unique. I agree with your "missing time" experience. Sometimes the film feels so lazily and randomly thrown together especially near the end. Ultimately I'd rather spend time with a lovely mess than a well oiled cypher though. Even as it fumbles and fails there's just something in "The Keep" that makes it more interesting than most. Some movies are more fun to think about than actually watch and this may be one of them. Thanks for the nod and for giving my head some more KEEP-candy to chew on! Unk

Eric said...

What seems to have been missed, as would be expected from book to movie, is the story that was outlined in the book which was a simple 'modern' portrayal of an ancient story, (Paradise Lost) which was a simple 'modern' portrayal of an ancient story (Bible).

The entire good v. evil issue has been diluted so extensively as to no longer represent even the concept that man is but a toy in the game being played by eternal powers beyond our comprehension.

Fred said...

I remember going to see this when it came out with my father (my mother and my then-girlfriend didn't "do" horror movies). We found it both interesting (great visuals and the TD score was almost as good as Sorcerer), but disappointing. I never read the source novel, but I'm wondering if Mann was going for the elemental being a Golem? It would have made perfect sense to dust off that old Jewish ghetto defender/out-of-control monster as a creature of "evil" (or misguided good) fighting the Nazis. By taking out a great deal of the source novel's (over)exposition, the ambiguity could have made for more appealing film.

Tenebrous Kate said...

OK, so I'm unsurprised that this movie & book generates some divergent feelings! Lemme dig into the business of responding here...

I think Vicar should be the unofficial Mr. Skin understudy. His knowledge of unclad anatomy in genre films is second only to that of the master :)

Darius, if you're interested in ambiguous Nazis (or, rather, ambiguous Germans living under the Nazi regime), check out Philip Kerr's Bernie Gunther series. They follow a non-Party member who is a private investigator looking into crimes that always have a tie-in to sinister Nazi stuff. Very cool, gritty and atmospheric, but DEPRESSING (as would only be appropriate, really).

David, I so want to get on your side of the fence--believe me! Would've loved to love this, but alas, did not.

Soukesian, I didn't know about the boardgame! And Unkle Lancifer pointed me in the direction of the graphic novel. Maybe one of those would be more my speed? :)

Chris, I *love* "In the Mouth of Madness" as well. That's a supernatural shocker I can whole-heartedly endorse!

Will, I've been reading Huysmans, so perhaps my dislike of the novel's style is more my OWN doing than anything inherent, but it didn't have the same kind of verbal play that I enjoy. And yes, you've nailed the best scene in the whole movie there. So much promise!

Unk, THIS is such a nugget of truthiness:

"Ultimately I'd rather spend time with a lovely mess than a well oiled cypher though"

Preach it, brother :)

You make an interesting point about the source inspiration, Eric! Food for thought, certainly.

Fred, it's interesting you bring up the Golem! At one point in the movie, I think the Golem is mentioned by name by Cuza (or his daughter--can't remember) as being a justification for his assistance of the monster. As you say, this would have been a good bit of subtext to emphasize.

David said...

Well that the thing. It's a German Expressionistic film in color and sound. Molasar is the Golem, Prochnow is Der Muede Tod, and McKellen is Caligari.

Luis said...

There was a board game??? Holy crap!
Saw The Keep when it first came out in cinemas and always had fond memories of it. The visuals were moody and creepy and it certainly looked different from every other horror movie at the time. Unlike slasher films which had interchangeable plots, locations and cast, this movie stood apart. My only gripe was that the muscled evil being got destroyed way to easily by the muscled good guy.

Soukesian said...

http://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/975/the-keep

Actually remember seeing this displayed in the window of our local gaming emporium.

Michael said...

Spot on commentary.

I've seen the movie twice, read the book, then saw the movie again, and came to almost exactly the same conclusion.

The movie had some fantastic set pieces, but overall was a mess, the last third of it is just short of unwatchabble (the missing time thing you pointed out).

The book starts off reasonably well, but the monster is revealed to early, and having been revealed, becomes just another comic book super-villain. The superhuman good vs. superhuman evil element seemed pretty trite, to me.

I hate the hollywood reboot fetish, but if any story is screaming for a remake/retooling, this one is. As long as they either keep the TD soundtrack, or hire John Carpenter to score it.

Hell, let Carpenter direct it!